|
Retirement Board Update - Meeting of August 19, 2005
- By Joe Flynn
To the Retirees:
The Aug. 19 Ret. Bd. meeting was a double-header.
The Aug. 12 agenda was continued for lack of a quorum so that agenda was
heard in the morning and the regular Aug. 19 hearing was conducted in
the afternoon.
The Board plans to meet twice a month; the second Friday
of the month will consider all financial matters and the third Friday
will consider all other Board agenda items. It worked fine this time and
should make better use of Board time as well as staff and consultant time
and make it easier for interested members to follow Board items.
Aug. 12 Agenda
The SDCERS June 30, 2004 Audit is nearing completion.
The "subsequent events analysis," which must review claims made by recent
lawsuits, is well underway. The Audit is expected at the October Board
meeting.
Staff and consultants made reports to the Board on,
asset allocation, real estate performance and an overall report on investment
performance. SDCERS investment portfolio continues to remain in the top
25% or better of all pension funds. These reports are presented to the
Board for their understanding and recommendations on courses of action,
and approval of suggested policies or programs. The investments are doing
well and are a continuing source of optimism.
Aug. 19 Agenda
Service retirements and Deferred Retirement Options
require Board approval; this is the easy part and it is usually on the
"consent agenda." Disability retirements are another matter since members
seeking disability can appeal an Adjudicator's decision to the Ret. Board.
Adjudicator's are usually retired Judges who conduct full Court hearings,
with court reporters, expert witnesses, and attorney's representing both
SDCERS and the member seeking the disability retirement. The fact that
the Ret. Bd. is four members short makes it difficult for the appellant
since they need seven (7) votes to sustain an appeal, and it is difficult
for the Board to act for the same. reason.
At this hearing the Board did agree, however, to make
a change in the way disability hearings are handled. Heretofore, the SDCERS
Medical Review Office and review committees had only two options: they
could recommend approval, and all other cases were set for an Adjudicator
Hearing. These Hearings are costly ($10,000 to $15,000 each), time consuming
for both staff and applicant, and generate backlogs up to two years. The
change approved by the Board provides a third option whereby the Medical
Review Officer and staff review committees can recommend denial which
will be heard by the Retirement Board. If the member wishes to appeal
the Board's decision, it may be appealed in Superior Court. This change
should reduce the backlogs in disability retirement requests and save
time and money all the way around. No existing avenues of appeals will
be closed.
One major item consisted of a briefing by Richard Vortmann,
former Board member, and vice chairman of the Pension Reform Committee
on the Minority Report which he had prepared. If interested you can access
the report on the City website at: http://www.sandiego.gov/pensionreform/pdf/minority040915.pdf
On a separate matter, a staff report and recommended
amendments to the agreement between the Unified Port District and SDCERS
for the administration of the Port's retirement system was presented to
the Board. The changes provide additional clarity for handling of Port
retirement funds and guidelines for accounting for those funds.
There was no "closed session" at this hearing. The
next scheduled Board hearings are: Sept. 9 for Financial matters, and
Sept. 16 for all other Board agenda items. Joe Flynn, Ret. Rep. to the
Retirement Board
Joe Flynn, Retiree Rep. to the Retirement Board
|